In the
documentary film “Black Gold”, several coffee farmers are shown as well as an
individual that is a higher official that fights to get farmers more money for
his country's coffee farmers. The background information for the film is that
coffee farmers in Ethiopia are making next to nothing for their coffee (but yet coffee sells for $2.90 a cup and the "middle men" reap the rewards when the farmers do the hard, backbreaking work). Since
these farmers live in a third world country there are no subsidies to assist
these farmers with their small incomes. Their only income is that dictated by the buyer of their coffee
(they have no choice but to accept the price presented to them or sell nothing at
all). One of the personal stories that
caught my attention was the tale of a generation farmer (his father was a
coffee farmer, etc.). He had been selling coffee his whole life and was living in,
what looked like, extreme poverty. He had 15 people living people with him that
he was trying to support. The coffee is selling for less and less in Ethiopia
each year, so this farmer’s situation is doing the same. By the end of the
film, they show him destroying his coffee fields so that he may plant another
crop called chat. Chat is an addictive narcotic that is popular in Africa and
sells fast (for a lot more money than coffee). He explains that he doesn’t
want it to be this way, but he has to or he and his family will die. He has no
other choice. This reflects the injustice of the exchange because he has to compromise
his morals just to survive. He also has to compromise his fields because he will
make no income at all while transitioning the fields from coffee to chat.
Coffee consumers would obviously overlook this because this personal story
doesn’t really affect them. In the consumers mind, they just see that one more
coffee farmer has left the business.
Another personal story that
caught my attention was that of the child at the feeding oasis. There was a
major famine in the area and a feeding station was set up. A child came in
that was very clearly malnourished, but she was turned away because “she was
moderately malnourished but severely malnourished”. They did not mention how
far her family had travelled to get there, but I’m sure it was no easy trek. So
this child will probably die. They also did not mention if any of her family
was in the coffee business, but it was mentioned that several families there
were. It was so awful to see the starving children being turned away and their
poor families can do nothing. The families are making hardly any money from the
coffee trade. The families have to make the tough decision of feeding their
child and feeding themselves so that they can work and bring in their little
income. The injustice with the trading association is that there are
representatives that travel and tell other coffee capitals that they are
experiencing famine, poverty, etc. and that if the farmers were given more
wages (a small increase would change their lives) then a lot of the issues in
the region would dissolve, but still not much is done. Coffee consumers would overlook
the famine issues because famine is rampant in a lot of third world countries. The coffee consumer would ration that this
happens in a lot of areas whether the wages of coffee are the cause or another
crop, it would happen anyway.
This brings up a viewpoint from Wilk’s
“Home Cooking in the Global Village”. He sort of argues that we should want to
know where our food comes from because of the effects it may have on the people
that grow/make it. The people that grow and make the products often do not get
to use them because they are too expensive. He also mentions how some cultures
are lost due to heavy industrialization/ globalization. We should care because often abused,
battered, and severely underpaid workers are preparing our grub. Sick animals may
also be harvested and served on your plate. He also mentions several other
reasons, but these reasons correlate to the coffee farmers in Ethiopia. It
should pull out our compassion for the workers now that we know their
circumstances. In conclusion, there is a severe injustice being served with
your cup of coffee and they come in the forms of malnourished children and
poverty stricken coffee farmers and their families.
References

You're bringing up a particularly provocative example of the generation farmer who suffers the consequences of decreasing coffee prices. Have you seen other farming industries where generation farmers face especially significant consequences of inconstant markets (more so, for instance, than independent farmers who may have more recently taken up farming)?
ReplyDeleteWell, the John Mellencamp music video did offer a look at that. The farmers were working insane hours and we seen saying that they were barely breaking even. It was apparent that these were generation farmers and not recently joined. Fortunately, this isn't much of a huge problem in the US since we do have subsidies for our farmers that offers quite a bit of protection and cushion for our farmers.
ReplyDeleteYou bring up a good example that should make consumers consider that if we were willing to pay more/fair price for food/goods then we might be able to lesson the drugs available for the drug trade.
ReplyDelete